Joost van de Brake Research on teams and modern work
Supported by NWO

Multiple team membership

When several teams compete for the same working week

Many people contribute to several teams at the same time. Each team brings its own meetings, deadlines, working relationships, and expectations. Experience from one team can help in another, yet the same arrangement can divide attention and leave priorities unresolved.

The strain depends on how the memberships fit together. A person with a clear home team and protected blocks of time faces a different week from someone who switches between teams throughout the day, even when both belong to the same number of teams. The MTM Portfolio Navigator helps people map that arrangement, see which parts create pressure, preserve what is useful, and choose a small work-design change to test.

Built from Joost van de Brake’s research on working across teams.

Example result 4 teams
First priority

Protect longer focus blocks

Frequent switches are breaking the week into small pieces.

What helpsExperience travels across teams
Two-week testProtect two 75-minute blocks and track unplanned switches

The basic idea

Look at how the teams fit together

Multiple team membership means working in two or more teams during the same period. It appears in healthcare, public services, logistics, factories, education, project work, and many other settings.

The daily experience depends on how those memberships are arranged. One person may have a clear home team and long blocks of focused work. Another may move between teams throughout the day. The Navigator helps both people describe their situation and choose a workable change.

One person carrying a laptop walks from a meeting with three colleagues to a meeting with three others, along a path that joins the two teams.

A practical tool for modern teamwork

Make a complicated working week easier to understand

Your team portfolio is the full set of teams you work in during the same period. The Navigator makes the shape of that portfolio visible.

Free interactive Navigator

More Than a Number: MTM Portfolio Navigator

Describe how your time is divided and how often you move between teams. The Navigator turns your answers into a clear portfolio map. Each suggestion explains why it appeared and opens the research behind it.

How it works

From your working week to a practical next step

  1. 01Describe your week

    Answer short questions about your teams and the way work moves between them.

  2. 02Read your map

    See your portfolio and the five work patterns that shape it.

  3. 03Choose a suggestion

    Use the explanation to decide which pattern needs attention first.

  4. 04Try one change

    Choose the people involved and what you will watch. Set a review date, then save or print the plan.

For educators

Two ready-to-use cases about working across teams

Each case includes a learner handout and a separate instructor guide. The stories use everyday work settings and explain the research in plain language.

01

Status and team re-entry

Back in the Regular Team

Maya returns to her regular team after six weeks in a temporary improvement team. People listened to her more in that team than they usually do in Atlas. Students decide how her leader can use Maya’s new idea and Ruben’s local knowledge to solve a real handover problem.

Class time
30 to 40 minutes
Topics
Teamwork, leadership, status, and team re-entry
02

Work design and switching

Four Teams, Two Very Different Weeks

Ruben and Aisha each work in four teams at a distribution centre. Ruben has a clear home team and protected work blocks. Aisha changes team context throughout the day. Students compare their working weeks and redesign the more fragmented arrangement.

Class time
30 to 40 minutes
Topics
Teamwork, HR, scheduling, and job design

A third case in the Teamwork course

These public cases complement a longer case used in Joost van de Brake’s Teamwork course. The three cases help students move from mapping a team portfolio to making leadership and work-design decisions.

Research behind the Navigator

See the research behind each suggestion

The Navigator turns a programme of multiple-team research into questions people can answer about their own work. These four published papers provide the main foundation. The tool shows additional current studies wherever they inform a suggestion.

01

Time and switching

More Than Just a Number

The study separates team count from time allocation, switching, a clear home team, and teammate familiarity.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 2024
02

Roles across teams

Can I Leave My Hat On?

The study examines how differences in a person’s roles across teams relate to role ambiguity and team performance.

Personnel Psychology, 2023
03

Organisational experience

Benefits and Disadvantages of Multiple Team Membership

The associations differed between newer and longer-serving employees, both in how they experienced the work and in their later performance.

Journal of Management Studies, 2020
04

Benefits and demands

Resource Leverage, Resource Depletion

Working across teams can open access to resources across the organisation while also creating additional demands.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 2022

Research behind the teaching cases

Each case explains the evidence behind it and how far that evidence can be used. The fictional story turns the research question into a decision students can discuss.

Current research

Status differences when people return to a team

The study follows 692 occasions when football players returned to their club after national-team duty. Larger differences in relative standing across the teams were associated with more chances created for club teammates.

Current research by Joost van de Brake on status differences across team memberships.

View Joost’s research
Published

Why two people in four teams have different weeks

The study compares several ways of describing work across teams. It shows how time distribution, switching, a clear home team, and prior familiarity shape a given arrangement.

Van de Brake, Van der Vegt, and Essens (2024), Journal of Applied Psychology.

Read the published paper

Share your experience

Tell me how the Navigator or cases worked for you

If you use the Navigator or one of the cases, send me a short note. Experiences from workplaces and classrooms help me improve the next resource.

h.j.van.de.brake@rug.nl